Thursday, January 14, 2010

Windansea and Rocks

I feel like the majority of my readers are probably in a cold place right now so I thought I’d share a little of the southern California warmth. I took a little drive down to San Diego not long ago to visit a friend and stopped at this beach before meeting up with him. I was looking for somewhere pretty that wouldn’t be crowded and based on descriptions on the internet, this beach looked good. It’s called Windansea Beach. I think that’s an appropriate name as there was wind and there was a sea, and then there was a beach. There were numerous rock formations on the beach and extending into the ocean, which on occasion made for some spectacular sights when large waves crashed into them.

Between the beach and the deeper water were some gnarly rocks but since the surf was up the local surfers were stoked and most certainly hanging ten while hitting the surf. I read online that the local surfers would act totally bogus towards anyone who wasn’t a local and tried to catch a wave without waiting their turn.

OK, that was ridiculous, but I believe everything I said was true. This beach was very pretty, as was the rest of San Diego. I’ve found that I really like these beaches with rocks around them for pictures, but I’d prefer a classic sand beach if I wanted to get in and go swimming. This photograph is a single exposure with some light editing in post.


Windansea and Rocks
Exif information
Model Canon EOS 20D
Original date 2009:11:14 9:59
Exposure time 1/500 sec
Focal length 50mm
F-Stopf/8
ISO speed ISO-100
Exposure Bias -1

5 comments:

  1. I love the random bird.

    So did any of the surfers give you flak? Or even acknowledge your existence?

    On the technical side, why did you choose f8?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I mean c'mon right!?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Haha, I was secretly hoping for one of those!

    ReplyDelete
  4. No, none of the surfers gave me any trouble.. They 'smelled what I was cooking,' if you know what I mean. Wait, that isn't a surfing term...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I picked f/8 because it's a pretty solid aperture for this lens. Professional tests have shown f/5.6 to be slightly sharper, but I doubt in real life you could tell the very small difference between f/5.6 and f/8. Plus I wanted a larger depth of field with the smaller aperture.

    ReplyDelete

ALL PHOTOS ON THIS SITE ARE PROPERTY OF JEREMY JEWELL. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED UNLESS PERMISSION WAS EXPLICITLY GRANTED BY THE OWNER.